Therapy itself would have to be matched to the patient by the abi

Therapy itself would have to be matched to the patient by the ability to foresee a positive response and predict side effects (Figure 1). Finally, taking all the above into consideration, the algorithm will have to provide an answer to the patient: is the benefit worth the risk for me? Figure 1. Matching therapy to patients by foreseeing a positive response and predicting side effects. Little data is available to weigh treatment Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical risks versus benefits. In a recent publication based on a single trial with a strictly defined patient population treatment success outweighed the risk of side effects.81 However, the specific patient population, the

specific drugs analyzed, and the short follow-up period only reiterate the difficulty in http://www.selleckchem.com/products/epacadostat-incb024360.html obtaining such solution for the variable

CD patient population. Another study demonstrated Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical that patients place symptom control in high priority and are willing to tolerate the risks,82 which is an important consideration when treatment is formulated. CONCLUSION With the advancement of research, the wide array of new drugs which affect different disease mechanisms, and the increasing understanding of CD pathogenesis, the relevance of various Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical biomarkers, and the natural course and response to treatment, it is mainly a question of time before highly efficacious, safe and personal treatment is Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical available to CD patients. Abbreviations: ASCA anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae; CD Crohn’s disease; CRP C-reactive protein; GM-CSF granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IBD inflammatory bowel disease; LOR loss of response; OmpC outer membrane porin C; UC ulcerative colitis. Footnotes Conflict of interest: Dr. Chowers acted as an advisor for Abbott Laboratories and received lecture fees from them. He also served as an advisor for Schering Plough.
One of the goals of personalized medicine is to identify patients at risk for future Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical cardiovascular events. Methods such as genomics, proteomics,

no metabolics, and transcriptomics are used to discern a marker or a set of markers that will identify the people who are at risk and also identify the optimal treatment for each individual. However, in certain areas, such as heart diseases, the predictability of these methods is lacking. About 1.4 million heart attacks (myocardial infarctions (MI)) occur in the United States every year. The most common screening for heart disease is done by taking a history and conducting minimally invasive blood tests at the doctor’s office. These tests provide certain parameters such as blood pressure, cholesterol glucose, and C-reactive protein levels, which, as shown in the Framingham study,1 are the traditional risk factors for development of heart disease.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>