Twelve participants had clean alpha oscillatory data that allowed us to quantify the number of topographic peaks, and were included in the analysis of the number of peaks. In order to determine peaks of alpha

amplitude, channels with alpha amplitudes larger than the median amplitude plus 1.5 times the median absolute deviation (a robust measure of variability in a sample) across all channels were selected in an occipito-parietal region of interest, which covered the back of the head. A peak was defined as a group of at least two neighboring channels. As the number of peaks was in a very limited range and not normally distributed, we determined the mean number for the divided and undivided conditions for each participant, and used the Wilcoxon

signed rank test to compare the means between conditions. check details In addition, we determined Ganetespib nmr the center location of each alpha peak, and determined the great-circle distance (the shortest distance between two points on a sphere) with the haversine formula (Sinnott, 1984). Assuming that the occipito-parietal part of the skull approximates a sphere, we used the width of a template head model as the diameter. If there were more than two alpha peaks (one participant with four detectable peaks in the ‘split right’ condition, and two participants with three peaks in the ‘split left’ condition), we chose the peaks with the largest distance. Different attentional theories predict different patterns of excitatory and suppressive modulation of cortical activity ROS1 when attention is allocated to non-contiguous parts of the visual field (Fig. 2A). For the evoked responses, we expect excitatory attentional modulation of the evoked responses for the inner stimuli in different conditions during early cortical processing. Examining the inner left stimulus, the single spotlight theory predicts that the evoked cortical response will be similar/identical for the ‘split left’ and ‘split

right’ conditions (Fig. 2B), as the attentional spotlight will encompass this stimulus for both of these conditions. The same holds for the right inner stimulus. In contrast, the blinking and divided spotlight theories predict that, for the inner left stimulus, the evoked responses in the ‘split left’ and ‘split right’ conditions will differ, with the ‘split right’ response being modulated by attention. For suppression of distracter locations (Fig. 2C), the single spotlight theory predicts no change in the number of alpha peaks, as there is only one stimulus that receives suppression. However, the topographic map of alpha suppression should change in order to adjust for the increase in attended space. Although the divided and blinking spotlight hypotheses predict the same pattern of attentional modulation for evoked responses, the two theories do not provide identical predictions for suppression of distracter locations.