To ensure that the monkeys encountered all trial types at the appropriate probability throughout

the block of trials, they completed sub-blocks of 48 trials consisting of four repeats of unique control trials (pro- or anti-saccades to the left or right, and hence 16 trials) and one repeat of each unique stimulation condition (pro- or anti-saccades to the left or right, over eight Pifithrin-�� manufacturer possible stimulation times, and hence 32 trials). We stress that ICMS-SEF was only delivered once on a given stimulation trial, but the exact time of stimulation varied amongst eight different possibilities. During the experiment, we measured the EMG activity of neck muscles as described in detail previously (Elsley et al., 2007). Briefly, multi-motor click here unit EMG was recorded via bipolar hook electrodes implanted chronically into a given muscle, and subsequently differentially amplified, filtered (100 Hz–4 kHz) and digitized at 10 kHz. Offline, EMG signals were further subjected to a 60-Hz notch filter, rectified and then bin-integrated

in 1-ms bins. We also recorded two-dimensional (2-D) gaze position in space and, when head-unrestrained, 2-D head position in space via a second search coil secured to the head post in the frontal plane. Offline analysis of eye, head, gaze and EMG signals was conducted using customized MATLAB (The Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) programs. A customized interface permitted trial-by-trial inspection of all trials, and this interface also automatically detected the start and end of saccades and head movements using velocity

criteria (30 or 10°/s, respectively), and classified trials into correct or erroneous pro- or anti-saccades (i.e. an anti-saccade error occurs when the monkey looked incorrectly to the cue on an anti-saccade trial). Trials could be rejected if necessary (e.g. if the monkey neither looked initially to the goal location nor incorrectly to the cue on anti-saccade trials, or if there were excessive levels of EMG activity due to idiosyncratic shifts in posture); such rejections occurred on far fewer than 1% of all trials (mean ± SD: 0.11 ± 0. 16%, range 0–0.55%). To facilitate the comparison of EMG recruitment levels across Rolziracetam muscles, monkeys and different experimental days, we normalized EMG levels to the level of recruitment attained in the 50 ms preceding cue onset, pooled across pro- and anti-saccade trials. This normalization procedure was performed on each muscle recording within a given day, and is necessary as each EMG electrode has a unique impedance. We acquired a complete block of 600 trials each from a total of 52 unique stimulation locations distributed over the left and right SEF (Fig. 1B; 24 from monkey S, 28 from monkey Z). A subset of this dataset was collected with the head unrestrained (six from monkey S, eight from monkey Z).