In Amazonia, indigenous people identify human heads or representa

In Amazonia, indigenous people identify human heads or representations of them as respected ancestors or vanquished enemies (Harner, 1984), so such effigies fit a ceremonial function for the mounds. As elements of the Anthropocene, the geo-glyphs constitute significant alterations in the topography of the

land. But because their discovery relies on deforestation, we do not know how numerous they were nor how far they extend, so their overall impact is difficult to assess. The most dramatic and long-lasting human cultural imprint selleckchem on the tropical forest environment is the extensive black-stained anthropic paleosols found widely on terra firme in the Amazon ( Eden et al., 1984, Eidt, 1984, Glaser and Birk, 2011, Kern, 1996, Lehman et al., 2010 and Nimuendaju, 2004:118–164; Plotkin, 1999, Smith, 1980 and Walker, 2004:73–110). The black soils are found in all major regions of Amazonia in varying forms and extents, both along mainstream and interfluvial regions, and, although they occur at water sources, like most human settlements, they are not confined to the mainstream whitewater rivers (contra Denevan, 1996 and McMichael et al., 2012). Although small pockets of

similar soils were produced at some Paleoindians and Archaic caves and rock shelters and some Formative open sites, the many radiocarbon dates on anthropic black soils show that they proliferated mainly after the beginning of the common era and peak during a time of increased populations in the last 1000 years of prehistory. They are still being produced today, and, although Low-density-lipoprotein receptor kinase sometimes assumed unique to Amazonia proper, were produced at prehistoric

FG-4592 price settlements in many other parts of the tropical world, including the Orinoco, Caribbean Colombia, the Gulf Coast, the Caribbean ( Siegel et al., 2005), and the Congo basin (e.g., de Maret, 1982: Plates 5, 6; Roosevelt, nd.). Brazilian Amazonians call the formation terra preta do Indio ( Smith, 1980), or black Indian soil, which is the oldest and most appropriate term for them. The black soils were discovered and excavated by 19th century natural scientists, who recognized them as archeological refuse from habitation sites, as local people did (Smith, 1879). Early 20th century research (Nimuendaju, 2004:118–164) found them to be ubiquitous at the large, sedentary settlements of the incised and punctate horizon and also at some sites of the polychrome horizon, an occurrence confirmed by more recent archeological investigations. When radiocarbon dating became available, cultural geographers confirmed their prehistoric age (Smith, 1980, Sternberg, 1960 and Sternberg, 1998:107–113). Many large or clustered cultural black soil sites in the Amazon and Orinoco have now been dated between about cal AD 1000 and 1450 (Eden et al., 1984, Eidt, 1984, Herrera, 1981, Morais and Neves, 2012 and Neves, 2012:168–245; Oliver, 2013, Roosevelt, 1980, Roosevelt, 1997 and Roosevelt, 2000).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>