Many laboratories have used commercially-available

cigarettes for the generation of smoke extracts. Such an approach however may lead to inter-laboratory differences since the smoke chemistry of different cigarette brands is diverse and this can give rise to diversity in cellular responses. For this reason, we suggest that the use of standardised reference cigarettes, such as the 3R4F reference cigarette (University of Kentucky College of Agriculture; http://www.ca.uky.edu/refcig/3R4F%20Preliminary%20Analysis.pdf), Transmembrane Transporters modulator would provide better uniformity of experimental responses both within the same laboratory and also between laboratories. With respect to experimental controls, the biological effects of smoke derived from a PREP should be compared to that of a conventional, commercially-available product (Institute of Medicine, 2012). A further issue concerning the exposure of in vitro models to cigarette smoke is the metabolic activation click here of the smoke extracts and their constituents. Certain cigarette smoke toxicants, for example benzo(a)pyrene, require metabolic activation in order to exert their effects ( Ma and Lu, 2007). Importantly, many in vitro cell cultures lack metabolic capacity and this can

be circumvented by either metabolically-activating the cigarette smoke extracts using other systems with this capacity (e.g. liver hepatocytes or liver extracts) before exposure, by activating the extract using a mammalian liver microsomal fraction such as S9, or by choosing primary cultured Bay 11-7085 cells with demonstrated active metabolic pathways. An approach that avoids the issue of metabolic activation of cigarette smoke extracts for in vitro models involves exposing cells to human sera obtained from smokers and non-smokers

( Fig. 2C). This approach has proven particularly useful, for example, in gaining mechanistic insight into the role of NO biosynthesis in the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular disease ( Barua et al., 2001 and Barua et al., 2003). Importantly, by performing clinical measurements of arterial reactivity by measuring flow-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in the subjects from whom the sera were obtained, it was possible to demonstrate a positive correlation between the clinical and the in vitro effects of cigarette smoking ( Barua et al., 2001) and this may add support to the appropriateness of this approach. More recently, Barbieri et al., (2011) demonstrated that sera from smokers elicited a stronger oxidative stress response in endothelial cells than sera from non-smokers, in terms of ROS production, p47phox translocation to the plasma membrane, and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) mRNA and protein expression.