Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA using SPSS software. Values were compared between different groups. P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The codon optimized L1 genes were expressed efficiently in Sf9 cells, and the expression levels were about 2-fold higher

than those of the wild type genes (data not shown). The L1 containing fractions of CsCl ultracentrifugation were examined under electron microscopy, and were confirmed to be fully assembled VLPs (Fig. 1A–C). The purities of HPV 16, 18, 58 L1 VLPs were analyzed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie blue staining, and only one band was observed when 10 μg of VLPs were loaded each lane (Fig. 1D). To investigate whether co-immunization of different types of VLPs will have some influence on serum antibody levels, we immunized mice with Trivalent-1 vaccine and corresponding monovalent vaccines. Mice sera Luminespib manufacturer were collected and tested by VLP-ELISA Selleckchem Venetoclax and pseudovirus neutralization assay. The results of VLP-ELISA (Fig. 2) showed that trivalent vaccine and monovalent vaccines could induce high level of circulating antibodies against component types. The antibody titers could reach to 4 × 104 to 8 × 104 2 weeks after the third immunization. No statistical differences were observed

between trivalent group and corresponding monovalent groups (P > 0.05 using one-way ANOVA). The type specific antibody level gradually declined with time, but still could remain above 103 for at least 1 year. At week 52, mice were boosted with an extra injection. Two weeks after that, the serum antibodies increased to or exceeded the highest level after previous three injections. To evaluate the protection ability of multivalent vaccines, we tested the in vitro neutralizing antibody titers of the sera collected 14 days after the second and the third injections by pseudovirus neutralization assay. As illustrated in Fig. 3, the neutralizing antibody levels of trivalent and monovalent vaccine immunized groups could reach to

2 × 103 to 104 after the second injection and 104 to 2.5 × 105 after the third injection, respectively. Different from the results of ELISA, we observed that there were significant differences between the anti-HPV 58 neutralizing antibody levels of trivalent group and HPV 58 monovalent group (P < 0.05, using PDK4 one-way ANOVA) after the second injection ( Fig. 3A), and also between the anti-HPV 18 neutralizing antibody levels of trivalent group and HPV 18 monovalent group (P < 0.05, using one-way ANOVA) after the third injection ( Fig. 3B). To analyze the differences between groups more intensively, we also compared percent infection inhibition of sera after second and third injections at dilutions of 1:10,000 and 1:50,000, respectively. At 1:10,000 dilution, the HPV 18 pseudovirus infection inhibition of trivalent group was significantly lower than that of HPV 18 L1 monovalent group ( Fig.