34 This speculation is supported by the findings35,

36 and 37 that reduced sensitivity of FITs for proximal colon lesions is related to hemoglobin breakdown during transit with loss of detectable epitopes. Undoubtedly, the transferability of quantitative results between different FITs can be improved through use of a standardized reporting unit system; however, findings of the present study reveal that current systems are not adequate for this purpose. In particular, antibodies provided by manufacturers of FITs are likely to differ considerably. To address this problem, the World Endoscopy Organization buy MS-275 has proposed that an independent calibration process of analytical performance is needed, in which the system under investigation is compared with an internationally accepted hemoglobin standard (eg, artificial stool material).38 and 39 Findings of the present report support this proposal. Strengths of the present study include the large sample size, long follow-up time, execution on a nationwide scale, and registry of cancer incidence and mortality, such that both short-term and long-term indicators could be evaluated. In addition to highlighting the need to improve the capacity of FITs to detect proximal CRC, findings selleck of the present study support the findings

of others40 that hemoglobin concentrations fall at higher ambient temperatures; the latter indicates the need to improve the stability of hemoglobin molecules present in fecal samples before conducting measurements. However, certain limitations of the present study should be noted. First, this study was not a randomized trial; the higher adherence rate of subjects receiving HM-Jack for diagnostic examination may have attenuated the differences oxyclozanide in the advanced adenoma detection rate and cancer detection rate between this group and those receiving OC-Sensor. In addition, their shorter follow-up time, which was related to the later marketing and selling of HM-Jack in Taiwan, may have led to an underestimation of the difference in test sensitivity between the 2 FITs. Although

regression analysis was employed in an attempt to address the baseline difference between the 2 groups, the absolute differences in test performance were small and residual confounding from measured or unmeasured factors cannot be excluded. Second, given the quantitative nature of this study, the possibility that some laboratories have adjusted the cutoff concentrations for both tests according to local screening capacities cannot be excluded. However, results in the conventional ranges of 50–100 ng hemoglobin/mL buffer for OC-Sensor and 8–12 ng hemoglobin/mL buffer for HM-Jack accounted for only 3% of both measures in the present study, and almost all interval cancers were below the defined cutoff concentrations and unlikely to alter the findings.